"Gotcha. We know
they've been lying all along, and now we can prove it. It's time to bring
sanity back to this debate. "
That's the only line that I
understood from these two articles. (Article #1 and Article #2) Code talk is
above my pay grade, however, it shouldn't be above real scientist and the MSM's
head. Well it is because they are ducking!
From NewsBusters:
If a software designer,
consultant, and business owner in his spare time can uncover this, why can't
America's leading science periodicals or key "journalists" in this
debate?
Is investigative journalism
truly dead in this country, or is it only employed to uncover truths that
either buttress the media's view of the world or undermine those that don't?
Consider that in the past
two years, we have witnessed the press:
•
Ignore important facts about a presidential candidate in
order to get him elected
•
Ignore or gloss over important facts about a President's
appointees to get them approved by Congress
•
Ignore important facts about a President's "czars"
•
Ignore important facts about a major "community
organizing" group
In the case of the latter
two issues, conservative bloggers, talk show hosts, and Fox News were alone in
coverage until the mainstream media eventually came aboard kicking and
screaming.
Now, revelations about some
of the country's leading climate scientists and activists -- who have ties to
the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as the
ear of the White House and leading members of Congress -- are going largely
ignored or soft-soaped.
Such is transpiring weeks
before a major international climate meeting in Copenhagen and as legislation
that could have almost unimaginable negative consequences on the economy is
being seriously considered by Congress.
Man made global warming,
like the Obama administration is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the free
world.
Recent Comments