Obama Christ Kingdom On Earth
Chapter 1:1-6
1 The journey will be difficult. The road will be long. I face this challenge with profound humility, and knowledge of my own limitations. But I also face it with limitless faith in the capacity of the American people. 2 Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to 3 look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; 4 this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth. 5 This was the moment—this was the time—when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves and our highest ideals. 6 Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America."'
What a load of crap!

Praise be the chocolate Jesus! Halleluia.
Posted by: Diana | June 04, 2008 at 02:17 PM
Best commentary on an Obama speech ever!
Posted by: M.E. | June 07, 2008 at 03:33 PM
What exactly is your problem with Obama's words? Your response is the juvenile, sophomoric kind of dialogue that plagues our political discourse. Rather than have a reasonable debate, you stoop to cutting the man down and dragging us all into the sludge which your world of politics resides in.
If you have a problem with Obama's policy positions, fine. I welcome that debate, but to simply minimize Obama's attempts to lift our nation beyond our current polarization exemplifies the problem itself.
Posted by: Chris VE | June 11, 2008 at 08:58 PM
Reasonable Debate about Obama's policy positions????? ROTFLMAO! What exactly are his policy positions? How does meeting with I'mANut Job from Iran constitute a policy that will protect America and our allies? How does being the most Liberal Socialist Senator in the entire Congress merit a debate. My employer giveth and Obama taketh away, .......... all my earnings. Don't bother with any details about the factors, i.e., Wright, Pfleger, Rezko, that went into forming the foundation of Obama's policies or his platform of hate speech and the denial of old fashioned Midwestern values. Again, bottom line, what are the policy positions you wish to debate, or is "We need Change and Have Faith in Me" his only policy position? Maybe Mr. Obama could see fit to help change the Congress' view on offshore drilling or drilling for oil in ANWR. Mr. Obama's word simply do not match his actions, behaviors, and tactics in trying to woo and sway the gullible American public. I can only hope that some of the views of men like James T. Harris, Charlie Sykes, and a few others start sinking in to the minds of the masses, or we are in for a severe problem with leaders(????) like Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and Durbin. Mr. Obama is a charlatan and snake oil salesman of immense talents, but a leader of the free world????? I think not.
Posted by: abehnke | June 12, 2008 at 06:15 AM
Chris,the problem with the words is they are crap. "this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; 4 this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal".
Those words ignore the TRILLIONS of dollars we've spent on medicare and medicaid to heal the sick who can't afford it. They ignore the progrowth policies of the last 2 decades that have keep our unemployment rate BELOW the historic "full employment" rate of 6% for nearly 20 years.
As for debating the policies of Obama it's tough to do. Change and Hope aren't policies they are rhetoric. His "transformation politics" line is crap, also. He's done NOTHING, in state or federal government to show he's willing to work across the aisle. He's actually done nothing, period. He has the best party line voting record of anyone in congress, yet we are to believe that he's the guy who can heal rifts?
Why don't you go get another cup of the kool-aid. Or, actually read up on his record, get informed, and get a clue. He's not the messiah, he's a 3rd rate Chicago politican who got where he is not by hard work, but by Emil Jones assigning his name to 29 bills in the Illinois Senate to get him some recognition.
He's in the US Senate because his backers sued to open old divorce records to destroy people. yet he won't release his own birth certificate.
Posted by: Crazy Politico | June 13, 2008 at 07:36 AM
Are you sure you are not a chocolate coated cracker hired to help an all white format look diversified.
Those white folk have sure stroked your ego, you can disagree with Obama but do you have to lower yourself to blasphemy?
The gumming down of Milwaukee talk radio is alive and well. Full of criticism with no answers.
Posted by: jpmelstrand | June 13, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Chocolate coated cracker...
Now that's new, a first, different, creative, expressive... I don't think I like it but it does get to the heart of it.
Now, re-read your post jpmelstrand and tell me again how I have lowered myself?
Isn't that like a pig calling a pig, a pig?
Posted by: James T | June 13, 2008 at 05:42 PM
James, you could have said isn't that like the pot calling the kettle black, but you might have offended someone :)
Posted by: Crazy Politico | June 13, 2008 at 07:32 PM
Yeah, I thought about that..
Posted by: James T | June 14, 2008 at 09:30 AM
Chris VE complains that we have nothing but sophomoric rhetoric with which to attack Obama's politics, so he calls down the thunder by saying we should debate the issues....and thunder he gets!
Most supporting Obama have little via Obama's political experience or policy positions to justify their support, while Obama dissenter's (isn't dissent patriotic? then why do black Americans attack James T. Harris for not going with the flow?) have well informed opinions on why they disagree with Obama's politics.
The reason people ridiculed this Obama speech is because the speech is so emotional, so ridiculous and demagogic that it does not warrant thoughtful response. To reason with the absurd is boring, so mock it they did, and rightly. Electing Obama is going to slow the rise of the oceans? That's quite an embarrassing claim.
The sad thing is that Obama's followers actually think he is saying something that warrants and intelligent critique.
Posted by: psycho-nude | June 15, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Well call me a powder-sugar coated milk dud because I think James T. is dead on.
I've worked in healthcare for more than ten years. I've seen St. Mike's close providing care to the sick while losing $100/million a year. I work for a private practice that used to be on call at St. Mike's. If you're on call, you see the patient, period, no one is turned away based on what insurance they have or don't or what their personal ability to pay might be. Every hospital has physicians on call.
This is when we started treating the sick? I guarantee Obama's net worth is thousands of times what mine is and I've been treating the sick. Where the hell has he been?
Posted by: Maddie - Saukville | June 17, 2008 at 06:20 PM